Posts Tagged names

Matrilineal matters, especially today

I love Lucy.

Not that Lucy. The eponymous ditzy redhead character portrayed by Lucille Ball could hardly be more different than the Lucy I’m talking about: Lucy Stone, the first recorded American woman to retain her own name after marriage.

Actually, I don’t really love this Lucy, who died 116 years ago today.

Lucy Stone, the first American woman to use a maiden name after marriage

Lucy Stone, the first American woman to use a maiden name after marriage. Image: Wikipedia

Rather,  as another married woman who’s demurred from adopting a husband’s name, I hold an abiding respect and appreciation for her. And as name pioneers go, I flatter myself as a kind of 21st century cousin.

When my daughter was born a year ago, my husband and I gave her my last name. Her four-year-old brother, meanwhile, has his last name. They each have the other parent’s last name as their middle moniker. So we parents, Cari Noga and Mike Henderson, have as offspring Owen Noga Henderson and Audrey Henderson Noga.

It’s different, to be sure. We’ve fielded some flak over it, mostly well-meaning inquiries about whether we’d considered that this might confuse the kids – and, to my ears, implying that’s exactly what we’d be doing.

Au contraire, I say. Indeed, it deviates from the U.S. norm. But if the kids are raised with this as their norm, there’s no place to sow confusion.  That question is also cloaked in the patriarchal stereotypes we’re trying to shrug off. No one objected that our son would be confused because he and I didn’t share a name. So why should our daughter feel confused about not sharing one with her dad?

After a year of living with it and writing about it (my personal blog explores the anomaly of having two kids with the same, married parents but different last names. OK, and a cute-kid picture now and then. I’m only human.) I’m ready to take the next step: advocacy for name choice equality. As this Salon article from 2000 puts it, why should a baby get the father’s last name? At the very least, can we think about why it’s the automatic choice for almost everyone? Other than that it’s expected and easy, there’s no real reason.

Admittedly, it’s uphill trudging. The most generous estimates I’ve seen say that only 10 percent of American women keep their names upon marrying, making for a small pool to persuade.  But the importance of the advocacy piece was reinforced for me this summer.

In August, researchers from Indiana University and the University of Utah presented to the American Sociological Association their findings that 71 percent of Americans they surveyed believe it’s better for women to change their surname upon marriage. In addition, fully half supported government regulation requiring name change. (See UPI piece and Times of India story.)

“It was a little shocking to see,” said Laura Hamilton, one of the study authors and a Ph.D candidate at Indiana. (Read more about the study, “Mapping Gender Attitudes with Views Toward Marital Name Change” and my interview with Hamilton on my personal blog.)

Shocking, indeed, are such value judgments about what should be a woman’s private, individual choice. It’s also evidence how hard it is, even 116 years after Lucy Stone, to swim against the tide.

But, like Nemo, I’ll just keep swimming. After all, while patriarchal tradition has prevailed the last few centuries in most of the Western world, it isn’t this way everywhere. When I first broached this idea to my husband, he started doing genealogical research and found that ancient Scots – a dominant strain in his ancestry – gave daughters their mothers’ names, while sons received their fathers’. Some Native American tribes and Jewish denominations, to name some found right here in the U.S.A., practice matrilineal traditions, where one’s lineage is traced through the mother.

Let me talk about my husband’s reaction to the idea more. He’s an open-minded guy, but I wondered if this would just be too far out there.
Initially, he did hesitate, because he wanted our kids to share a last name. But I asked him to keep thinking about it. As he did, I got more invested in the idea for what I think it teaches both our kids.

We’re providing a crystal clear, living lesson of what we believe about family: Mom and dad are equally important influences in their lives.

So, from my cyber-soapbox, I make my pitch to you. Think about it a matrilineal name. Talk about it with your husband. (Or, husbands, with your wives.) Block out tradition, the questions from family members, all the white noise that obscures what really matters. Then, just do it.

What’s in a name?

Sherry Carr Deer is a Mommy to Nicholas who just turned 3, fiance to William, the widow of Mark, and a PR professional at a non-profit hospital. You can read more of her posts here.

I am having a great time planning our wedding. William is such a great fiance, shares his opinions, but has for the most part let me go with my feelings. Nicholas was recently ring barer in his cousin’s wedding, so every time we talk about our wedding with him, he asks if he’ll get to wear a tuxedo.

In the course of the planning, I’ve been thinking a lot about my name…and Nicholas’ name…and William’s name. Specifically whether or not to change mine when we get married.

When Mark and I married, it was important to me to keep my name (Carr) and add his (Deer). All my introductions with new people sound like this, “No, that’s two last names with no hyphen. Right. Carr with 2 “r’s” and Deer like the animal. No, no “e” on the end of Deer. Like the animal. D-E-E-R.” Despite warnings from married female professors at the time, I didn’t just keep my name. But, it’s a name that once people get it, don’t usually forget it. I think it’s something about the imagery of a car hitting a deer.

Well, my fella’s last name isn’t quite so distinctive, and it will make me one of many with the same name. And if I take his name and drop mine altogether, I won’t have a common name with Nicholas at all. But if I don’t take his name in some form, I won’t have a common name with potential children I have with William.

For those of you who have remarried (or have siblings because of blended families), how big a deal is it to have a household full of different last names? Is it strange? Hard to navigate? Would it be difficult for Nicholas to be the only one in our family with his name?

I do have to admit that it would be nice to never have to spell my last name and to always know where my last name should fall in the alphabitized list at a doctor’s office. My introductions to new people would sound like this, “That’s Sherry with two r’s. Last name Smith.” Simple. Elegant.

What do you think? How does “Sherry Smith” sound? Do any of you have a different professional name from your personal name?

Sherry Carr Deer-Smith?